I owe my readers a frank discussion of risk in relation to commercial nuclear power generation. I would like to start this discussion with a picture that is worth 10,000 words.
The photo shows an obviously pregnant woman smoking while wondering about the effect of the noise from jackhammers on her unborn child. Now, I don't fault this lady for worrying about her unborn child. I fault her for engaging in a significant and known risk - smoking- while worrying about noise from jackhammers.
This is the camel and gnat analogy that I have written about before. She is smoking "camels" (pun intended) while worrying about gnats (noise from jackhammers).
She is directly inhaling carcinogens, mutagens, tar, and carbon monoxide, which she probably does multiple times everyday, while the jackhammers are probably intermittent for 5 days a week until the construction job is done. One is concentrated, known, and volitional (smoking), while the other is diffuse. non-volitional, and more distant from her baby (noise from jackhammers).
I believe this photo captures the quintessence of the average American response to risks posed by commercial nuclear power generation - straining at gnats while swallowing camels. By this I mean, that Americans engage in known and significant risks, which they think nothing of, while having Fonda-esque epileptic fits over the much, much, much smaller riks posed by commercial nuclear power generation.
The next installment on this topic will discuss common, everyday risks and how they compare to those from commercial nuclear power generation.
Why worry about unknown risks while engaging in significant, known risks? |
This is the camel and gnat analogy that I have written about before. She is smoking "camels" (pun intended) while worrying about gnats (noise from jackhammers).
She is directly inhaling carcinogens, mutagens, tar, and carbon monoxide, which she probably does multiple times everyday, while the jackhammers are probably intermittent for 5 days a week until the construction job is done. One is concentrated, known, and volitional (smoking), while the other is diffuse. non-volitional, and more distant from her baby (noise from jackhammers).
I believe this photo captures the quintessence of the average American response to risks posed by commercial nuclear power generation - straining at gnats while swallowing camels. By this I mean, that Americans engage in known and significant risks, which they think nothing of, while having Fonda-esque epileptic fits over the much, much, much smaller riks posed by commercial nuclear power generation.
The next installment on this topic will discuss common, everyday risks and how they compare to those from commercial nuclear power generation.
No comments:
Post a Comment